Uniontown Pennsylvania Message Forums - WWW.UNIONTOWN.COM https://www.uniontown.com:443/ |
|
MIKE LINDELL SUPREME COURT FILING AND ELECTION INTERGRITY https://www.uniontown.com:443/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2280 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | MIKEFROMUNIONTOWN [ Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | MIKE LINDELL SUPREME COURT FILING AND ELECTION INTERGRITY |
Ok He just released the filing this afternoon and the part about Pennsylvania and the allegations pasted here. There is no doubt if MANY minds the election was STOLEN from President Trump and our state was one of the MAJOR if the the most major "actors" (to use Commonwealth Legalese). I am not holding on to some belief that President Trump will be reinstated. Not at all. However just like many we still will TRY to make sure elections have a chance of being honest IN THE FUTURE. Now in the spring primary this year there were some precincts that didn't count ..didn't MACHINE count a single REPUBILICAN vote but did count Dem votes. Let's just say I have that on extremely reliable evidence Yet we were ASSURED by the MEDIA that ALL OUR VOTES WERE COUNTED after the polls closed. And with the GROSS AMOUNT OF MONOPOLY money floating around and being used to GREASE the wheels of players, a truly honest count may never occur or if it does so much Weimar and MORE damage will be done the count won't matter. Myself I am only posting the points made for discussion and the fact tha in theory at least there still is a FIRST AMENDMENT of free speech and the right to assemble. CENSORSHIP on the big platforms is rampant and sites like this can be a great place to discuss "verboten" issues. It was ONE year ago when this country's future hung in the balance. ONE PENNSYLVANIA JUDGE , did what she could and it lasted for the THANKSGIVING holiday before being OVERTURNED BY THE STATE SUPREME COURT..... One person can make a difference even if its only for a few days. well here is Mr Lindell's supreme court filing the sections that apply to Pennsylvania: The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s electoral votes were unlawfully certified and counted. 140. Pennsylvania has 20 electoral votes, with a statewide vote tally of 3,377,654 for Mr. Trump and 3,458,229 for Mr. Biden, a margin of 80,575 votes. 141. The number of illegal votes and votes affected by the various constitutional violations far exceeds the margin of votes separating the candidates. 1. Pennsylvania’s voter registration system can be easily hacked and manipulated. 142. Pennsylvania is one of a handful of states that allow third party entities some type of access to voter registration systems via an application programming interface (“API”). Most states and most countries prohibit access to sensitive election data but 4 49 mysteriously added to the SURE system and backdated shortly before the November 2020 election. 145. Specifically, the SURE system includes a unique ID number for each registered voter. That number is proceeded by a hyphenated county code. The February 1, 2021, voter roll (the “Full Voter Export” or “FVE”) contains 74,090 voters with the associated unique ID that have a registration date of April 6, 2020, or earlier—55,823 of these voters are recorded as having voted in 2020. However, the FVE dated April 6, 2020, has no record of these voters— meaning these purported 74,090 voters were inexplicably added to the SURE system and increased the voting population in the months leading up to the November 2020 election. These are not inactive voters. Inactive records are in the FVE and would have shown up in the April 6, 2020, FVE had they existed. 2. Pennsylvania’s final results show 49,141 more votes than voters and the Secretary of State unlawfully certified the Pennsylvania election results. 146. Secretary Boockvar certified the election results on November 24, 2020. However, the SURE system, the official registrar of votes pursuant to 25 PA. STAT. § 1222, reflected that there were a whopping 784,752 more votes than voters. 147. Pennsylvania law expressly prohibits certifying until after the investigation of an over-vote: If . . . it shall appear that the total vote returned for any candidate or candidates for 50 the same office or nomination . . . exceeds the total number of persons who voted in said election district or the total number of ballots cast therein . . . such excess shall be deemed a discrepancy and palpable error, and shall be investigated by the return board, and no votes shall be recorded from such district until such investigation shall be had . . . . 25 PA. STAT. § 3154 (emphasis added). 148. No investigation of the 784,752 votes before certification, as required under 25 PA. STAT. § 3154, was undertaken. 149. On December 28, 2020, Boockvar tried to excuse the massive number of extra votes compared to the number of voters—still over 205,000 as of that date—by issuing a press release stating “[a]t this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system.” 150. However, as of February 1, 2021, all Pennsylvania counties closed out their elections in the SURE system—meaning all counties had completed updating the voter information for the November 2020 election. The SURE system reflects that there are still 49,141 more ballots cast included in the certified vote tally, than there were voters in the November 2020 election. No explanation for this gross discrepancy has ever been given by the State. 151. As stated above, Boockvar’s excuse that not all counties had finished uploading their results to the SURE system is now moot. That leaves the fact that there are at least 49,141 more confirmed votes 51 than voters demonstrating the stark illegality of the Pennsylvania election. 152. In Philadelphia County alone, 792 out of 1703 precincts (also called “districts”) had more votes for President than voters who participated in the election. Those 792 precincts had a total of 346,484 votes for President. In those 792 precincts, Biden received 286,014 votes and Trump received 57,253 votes, for a net margin of 228,761 votes for Biden. Under 25 PA. STAT. § 3154, “no votes shall be recorded from such district until such investigation shall be had . . . .” No investigation into these discrepancies has been conducted. 153. Biden’s margin of 228,761 votes in those 762 precincts, none of which should have been recorded, far exceeds his margin of victory in Pennsylvania. 154. In Alleghany County, 767 out of 1,323 precincts had more votes for President than voters who participated in the election. In those 767 precincts, Biden received 246,446 votes and Trump received 153,060 votes, for a net margin of 93,386 votes for Biden—which alone exceeds Biden’s margin of victory. Combined with Philadelphia County, Biden received 322,147 more votes than Trump. 25 PA. STAT. § 3154 prohibited from being counted until these discrepancies were resolved. Boockvar’s certification of the vote 24, 2020 violated 25 PA. STAT. § 3154, and is therefore void. 52 3. Pennsylvania misled this Court and continued to illegally count tens of thousands of ballots received after November 3, 2020. 155. On September 17, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court voted 4-3 that all mailin ballots postmarked by 8:00 on Election Day, and received by 5:00 p.m. November 6, 2020, even those lacking a postmark or bearing an illegible postmark, would be counted. Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar, 238 A.3d 345 (Pa. 2020). 156. On October 19, 2020, this Court split 4-4 on whether to stay that decision by Pennsylvania Supreme Court leaving that unconstitutional decision to stand. 157. After Justice Barrett’s confirmation, the Republican Party sought expedited relief to resolve this issue before the November 2020 election. On October 28, 2020, in a classic bait and switch, Pennsylvania used guidance from its Secretary of State that Pennsylvania would segregate potentially unlawful ballots to argue that this Court should not expedite review. See Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar, 141 S. Ct. 1, 2 (2020) (“we have been informed by the Pennsylvania Attorney General that the Secretary of the Commonwealth issued guidance today directing county boards of elections to segregate [late-arriving] ballots”) (Alito, J., concurring) The Court would reasonably rely on such a representation. 158. Before the ink was dry on that decision, however, Pennsylvania changed that guidance, breaking the State’s promise to this Court. On November 6, 2020, Justice Alito ordered all county 53 boards of election to comply with the guidance “that all ballots received by mail after 8:00 p.m. on November 3 be segregated and . . . if counted, be counted separately.” Republican Party v. Boockvar, 208 L.Ed.2d 293, 294 (U.S. 2020) (“The application received today also informs the Court that neither the applicant nor the Secretary has been able to verify that all boards are complying with the Secretary’s guidance, which, it is alleged, is not legally binding on them.”) (Alito, J., Circuit Justice). 159. Before Justice Alito’s order dated November 6, 2020, Pennsylvania illegally counted at least 61,855 illegal ballots which were received after the statutory 8:00 pm November 3, 2020, deadline by virtue of the fact that Pennsylvania did not segregate those ballots. The Department of State’s records reflect that: 50,285 ballots were received between November 4 through November 6, 2020; 11,570 ballots were received between November 7 through November 11, 2020; and 10,038 were received after November 11, 2020. Pennsylvania was still counting ballots after November 17, 2020.15 160. Secretary Boockvar claimed that only about 10,000 ballots were counted after 8 p.m. on November 3, thereby admitting ballots were illegally counted, but she offered no proof that only 10,000 ballots were illegally counted. 15 URLs rewritten, remove parenthesis (https:)//www.media.pa.gov/pages/statedetails.aspx?newsid=434 (last visited Nov. 23, 2021) 54 4. The Pennsylvania Secretary of State unconstitutionally threw out state election integrity laws governing mail-in ballots. 161. In 2016, Pennsylvania received 266,208 mail-in ballots; 2,534 of them were rejected (.95%). 16 However, in 2020, Pennsylvania received 2,623,867 mail-in ballots—nearly 10 times the number of mailin ballots compared to 2016. Despite this flood of ballots, the reported rejection rate was just 1.3% with just 34,171 ballots rejected.17 As explained below, this vastly larger volume of mail-in ballots was treated in an unconstitutionally modified manner that included: (1) doing away with the Pennsylvania’s signature verification requirements; and (2) blocking poll watchers in Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties in violation of State law. 162. The blatant disregard of statutory law renders all mail-in ballots constitutionally tainted and should not have formed the basis for appointing or certifying Pennsylvania’s presidential electors to the Electoral College. 163. Specifically, Pennsylvania’s thenSecretary of State, Kathy Boockvar, without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated several Pennsylvania statutes requiring signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots. 16 U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Report to Congress, Election Administration and Voting Survey: 2016 Comprehensive Report, at 24 (2017). 17 U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Report to Congress Election Administration and Voting Survey: 2020 Comprehensive Report, at 36 (2021). 55 Pennsylvania’s legislature has not ratified these changes, and the legislation did not include a severability clause. 164. On August 7, 2020, the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and others filed a complaint against Secretary Boockvar and other local election officials, seeking “a declaratory judgment that Pennsylvania existing signature verification procedures for mail-in voting” were unlawful for a number of reasons. League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, No. 2:20-cv-03850-PBT, (E.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2020). 165. The Pennsylvania Department of State quickly settled with the plaintiffs, issuing revised guidance on September 11, 2020, stating in relevant part: “The Pennsylvania Election Code does not authorize the county board of elections to set aside returned absentee or mail-in ballots based solely on signature analysis by the county board of elections.” 166. The Pennsylvania Department of State’s guidance directly contradicted Pennsylvania law. First, Pennsylvania Election Code mandates that, for non-disabled and non-military voters, all applications for an absentee or mail-in ballot “shall be signed by the applicant.” 25 PA. STAT. §§ 3146.2(d) & 3150.12(c). Second, Pennsylvania’s voter signature verification requirements are expressly set forth at 25 PA. STAT. 350(a.3)(1)-(2) and § 3146.8(g)(3)-(7). 167. The Pennsylvania Department of State’s guidance unconstitutionally did away with Pennsylvania’s statutory signature verification requirements. Approximately 70% of the requests for absentee ballots were from Democrats and 25% from 56 Republicans. Thus, this unconstitutional abrogation of state election law greatly inured to Mr. Biden’s benefit. 168. In addition, in 2019, Pennsylvania’s legislature enacted bipartisan election reforms, 2019 Pa. Legis. Serv. Act 2019-77, that set inter alia a deadline of 8:00 p.m. on election day for a county board of elections to receive a mail-in ballot. 25 PA. STAT. §§ 3146.6(c), 3150.16(c). Acting under a generally worded clause that “Elections shall be free and equal,” PA. CONST. art. I, § 5, cl. 1, a 4-3 majority of Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court in Pa. Democratic Party v. Boockvar, 238 A.3d 345 (Pa. 2020), extended that deadline to three days after Election Day and adopted a presumption that even non-postmarked ballots were presumed timely. 169. Absentee and mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania were thus evaluated under an illegal standard regarding signature verification. It is now impossible to determine which ballots were properly cast and which ballots were not. 170. In addition, on December 4, 2020, fifteen members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives led by Rep. Francis X. Ryan issued a report to Congressman Scott Perry (the “Ryan Report”) (Tab 16) stating that “[t]he general election of 2020 in Pennsylvania was fraught with inconsistencies, documented irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, precanvassing, and canvassing that the reliability of the mail-in votes in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is impossible to rely upon.” 57 171. The Ryan Report’s findings are startling, including: • Ballots with NO MAILED date. That total is 9,005. • Ballots Returned on or BEFORE the Mailed Date. That total is 58,221. • Ballots Returned one day after Mailed Date. That total is 51,200. Id. at 5. 172. These nonsensical numbers alone total 118,426 ballots and exceed Mr. Biden’s margin of 80,555 votes over Mr. Trump. But these discrepancies pale in comparison to the discrepancies in Pennsylvania’s reported data concerning the number of mail-in ballots distributed to the populace—now no longer subject to legislatively mandated signature verification requirements. 173. These stunning figures illustrate the out-of-control nature of Pennsylvania’s mail-in balloting scheme. Democrats submitted mail-in ballots at more than two times the rate of Republicans. /////// |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |